Ron Paul and the Presidency – It’s Closer than the Media thinks

By Doug Wead

“Control the coinage and the courts, the rabble can have the rest.” – The Princess Irulan in Frank Herbert’s Dune.

Last week was a good week for the so-called “constitutional wing” of the Republican Party, those indomitable Ron Paul people. Okay, sure, the next presidential election is a long way off but a recent snapshot taken by pollsters shows a surprising opening for the Texas congressman, the man who says that the Federal Reserve should be audited. The general public is moving toward Ron Paul, even if most of them don’t even know who he is.

According to a recent Gallup Poll, 50 per cent of all Americans don’t think Obama deserves re-election. Only 38 per cent think he does. 65 per cent think that most members of Congress don’t deserve re-election. Three of four Americans are dissatisfied with the direction of the country (as reported in USA Today, April 1, 2010).

Meanwhile, 48 per cent of Americans think that Sarah Palin is not ready to be president. 29 per cent think she is.

And what gives the Ron Paul campaign an opening is how equally angry the public is with both political parties. For the first time a majority of the public puts both Republicans and Democrats in the unfavorable column. (Ibid.) A pox on both of their houses. It is a complaint that Ron Paul has been making for years.

Continue Reading

U.S. Deaths Double in Afghanistan as Troups Pour In

posted by Josiah Garber on June 3, 2010
in Politics, War & Peace

U.S. deaths, wounded in Afghanistan outpace last year’s rate as reinforcements arrive

SEBASTIAN ABBOT

AP News

The number of U.S. troops killed in Afghanistan has roughly doubled in the first three months of 2010 compared to the same period last year as Washington has added tens of thousands of additional soldiers to reverse the Taliban’s momentum.

Those deaths have been accompanied by a dramatic spike in the number of wounded, with injuries more than tripling in the first two months of the year and trending in the same direction based on the latest available data for March.

U.S. officials have warned that casualties are likely to rise even further as the Pentagon completes its deployment of 30,000 additional troops to Afghanistan and sets its sights on the Taliban’s home base of Kandahar province, where a major operation is expected in the coming months.

“We must steel ourselves, no matter how successful we are on any given day, for harder days yet to come,” Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said at a briefing last month.

In total, 57 U.S. troops were killed here during the first two months of 2010 compared with 28 in January and February of last year, an increase of more than 100 percent, according to Pentagon figures compiled by The Associated Press. At least 20 American service members have been killed so far in March, an average of about 0.8 per day, compared to 13, or 0.4 per day, a year ago.

Britain, which has the second largest contingent, has lost at least 33 troops since Jan. 1, compared with 15 for the same period last year.

The steady rise in combat deaths has generated less public reaction in the United States than the spike in casualties last summer and fall, which undermined public support in the U.S. for the 8-year-old American-led mission here. Fighting traditionally tapers off in Afghanistan during winter months, only to peak in the summer.

After a summer marked by the highest monthly death rates of the war, President Barack Obama faced serious domestic opposition over his decision in December to increase troops in Afghanistan, with only about half the American people supporting the move. But support for his handling of the war has actually improved since then, despite the increased casualties.

The latest Associated Press-GfK poll at the beginning of March found that 57 percent of those surveyed approved his handling of the war in Afghanistan compared to 49 percent two months earlier. The poll surveyed 1,002 adults nationwide and had a margin of error of plus or minus 4.2 percentage points.

Michael O’Hanlon, a foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution, said the poll results could partly be a reaction to last month’s offensive against the Taliban stronghold of Marjah in Helmand province, which the Obama administration painted as the first test of its revamped counterinsurgency strategy.

Some 10,000 U.S., NATO and Afghan forces seized control of the farming community of about 80,000 people while suffering relatively few deaths. But the Taliban continue to plant bombs at night and intimidate the locals, and the hardest part of the operation is yet to come: building an effective local government that can win over the loyalty of the people.

“My main thesis … is that Americans can brace themselves for casualties in war if they consider the stakes high enough and the strategy being followed promising enough,” O’Hanlon said. “But such progress in public opinion is perishable, if not right away then over a period of months, if we don’t sustain the new momentum.”

A rise in the number of wounded — a figure that draws less attention than deaths — shows that the Taliban remain a formidable opponent.

The number of U.S. troops wounded in Afghanistan and three smaller theaters where there isn’t much battlefield activity rose from 85 in the first two months of 2009 to 381 this year, an increase of almost 350 percent. A total of 50 U.S. troops were wounded last March, an average of 1.6 per day. In comparison, 44 were injured during just the first six days of March this year, an average of 7.3 per day.

The increase in casualties was partly driven by the higher number of troops in Afghanistan in 2010. American troops rose from 32,000 at the beginning of last year to 68,000 at the end of the year, an increase of more than 110 percent.

“We’ve got a massive influx of troops, we have troops going into areas where they have not previously been and you have a reaction by an enemy to a new force presence,” said NATO spokesman Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale.

The troop numbers have continued to rise in 2010 in line with the recent surge. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Thursday that a third of the additional forces, or 10,000 troops, are already in Afghanistan. They plan to have all 30,000 troops in the country before the end of the year.

U.S. officials have said they plan to use many of the additional forces to reassert control in Kandahar province, where the insurgents have slowly taken territory over the past few years in an effort to boost their influence over Kandahar city, the largest metropolis in the south and the Taliban’s former capital.

Many analysts believe the Kandahar operation will be much more difficult than the recent Marjah offensive because of the greater dispersion of Taliban forces, the urban environment in Kandahar city and the complex political and tribal forces at work in the province.

The goal of both operations is to put enough pressure on the Taliban to force them to the negotiating table to work out a political settlement to end the war — a process the U.S. believes will only gain momentum once the militant group has lost traction on the battlefield.

“Until they transition to that mode, then we will have fighters ready to take shots at us and plant IEDs (improvised explosive devices),” said Lt. Col. Calvert Worth Jr., commanding officer of the 1st Battalion, 6th Marines Regiment in central Marjah.

__

Associated Press Writer David Stringer in London and Monika Mathur at the AP’s News Research Center in New York contributed to this report.

Source: AP News

NATO’s Afghan Civilian Killings More than Doubled in Early 2010

posted by Josiah Garber on June 2, 2010
in Politics, War & Peace

Is This the “Progress” President Obama Spoke Of?

by Jason Ditz

Yesterday much was made of the Red Cross report that showed that the number of civilians wounded by Taliban bombings had increased some 40% year over year. Today, the figure is much more stark, as NATO’s own figures revealed that the number of civilians killed by NATO in Afghanistan had well more than doubled year over year.

In the first three months of 2009, NATO killed 29 Afghan civilians according to their own, extremely conservative statistics. In the same period of this year, those numbers show at least 72 Afghan civilians killed by the international forces.

The numbers come as Gen. Stanley McChrystal promises yet more changes to the rules of engagement in the nation, designed to minimize civilian killings by the international forces. It should be noted, however, that Gen. McChrystal revised these rules several times in late 2009, only to see the civilian killings rise precipitously.

It also comes just a day after President Obama gave a high profile interview insisting “progress” was being made in the war, and that the Taliban’s momentum had been blunted. This could perhaps be defended in that the Taliban’s civilian toll rose only 40% while NATO’s civilian toll rose 148%, but this hardly seems to be the sort of progress that the president should be bragging about in international interviews.

Original Article

Ron Paul on MSNBC, Tea Parties, War, Economics

Rand Paul Wins Primary for Kentucky Senate!

posted by Josiah Garber on May 19, 2010
in Politics, War & Peace

I pray you defend peace as much as your father did. Thank you for opposing the wars!

Bring the Troops Home! – Ron Paul

Bitter Laugh Music Video – By Chris Floyd

posted by Josiah Garber on May 1, 2010
in War & Peace

AMAZING Speech By War Veteran!

posted by Josiah Garber on April 24, 2010
in War & Peace

RON PAUL on HR2194: “War Propaganda!”

posted by Josiah Garber on April 24, 2010
in Economics, Politics, War & Peace

The George Bush You Never Knew.

posted by Josiah Garber on April 20, 2010
in Politics, War & Peace

Wow.  It didn’t take him long to change his tune.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes